Touchdown, IRS?

It's Week Nine of the 2013 football season, and millions of Americans are following every play. The Kansas City Chiefs are still undefeated. The New York Giants have finally won a couple of games. And playoff races are already starting to take shape. (Bengals, anyone?) So, what does any of this have to do with taxes?

Today's National Football League is the biggest spectacle since the Romans packed the Coliseum to watch the Christians take on the Lions. (Needless to say, the Lions were heavy favorites — and usually covered the spread.) Last year, the league generated $9.5 billion in revenue from a combination of TV rights, ticket sales, stadium concessions, and licensing agreements. The biggest part of that cash geyser goes to the players (who naturally pay tax on their salaries). More chunks go to the owners (who pay tax on theirs), and stadium vendors (who pay tax on all those eight-dollar beers).

The NFL's league office, which promotes the sport and organizes the teams, took in $255.3 million last year, mostly from team dues. That same year, the league spent $332.9 million, including $35.9 million to a construction company for new office space (who naturally paid tax on their share), $29.4 million in salary for Commissioner Roger Goodell (who of course paid tax on his share), and what must seem like a token $2.3 million in grants for community groups like the United Way.

So, it sure sounds like the receivers at Team IRS are catching their share, right? Well, while the team owners, the players, the t-shirt sellers, and beer vendors are all in it for the money, would you believe the league office itself is a "not-for-profit" entity? That makes it sort of like the American Red Cross — if the Red Cross were in the business of giving concussions instead of treating them. (Technically, the Red Cross is a "501(c)(3)" public charity, while the NFL is a "501(c)(6)" trade association.) And that means the league office itself could earn $100 million or more per year without paying a dime in federal income tax. Talk about an end run around the IRS!

Last month, Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) introduced the PRO Sports Act to revoke the tax exemption for professional sports leagues earning more than $10 million. This would of course affect the NFL, along with the National Hockey League, the Professional Golf Association, and other pro sports groups. Coburn is joined by 275,000 Americans who have signed a Change.org petition to strip the league of their nonprofit ball. Senator Coburn alleges unsportsmanlike conduct, saying that "working Americans are paying artificially high rates in order to subsidize special breaks for sports leagues," and estimates that his bill could generate at least $91 million of new revenue every year from the NFL and NHL alone. (So far, Coburn hasn't found any co-sponsors. Do you think he would be so bitter if Oklahoma City had a team?)

There's certainly no reason a league office needs a tax exemption to operate. Major League Baseball gave up theirs in 2007, partly to avoid the salary disclosures that come with tax-exempt status. The National Basketball Association has always been a for-profit entity owned by the various teams.

And if the NFL does lose their tax-exempt status, they can still avoid paying any tax. How can they do that? Through smart planning, of course — the same sort of planning we use to minimize your tax. But the clock is counting down for 2013, and there are no overtimes in this contest. So call now for your game plan!

Voting With Your Feet

It's safe to say that people don't like paying taxes. America was born out of a tax rebellion, and Americans have resisted every variety of tax ever since. Some of them even go as far as renouncing their American citizenship to avoid the tax man.  

Expatriation sounds like an awfully big step just to pay less tax. But more and more Americans are doing it. In 1994, Campbell's Soup heir John T. "Ippy" Dorrance III saw greener pastures in Ireland, trading what was then a 55% estate tax for Ireland's 2%. And just last year, Facebook founder Eduardo Saverin "defriended" Uncle Sam and the IRS after moving to Singapore, potentially saving hundreds of millions in tax. Americans who give up their citizenship pony up an "exit tax" on the value of their assets when they leave, essentially paying as if they had sold everything the day before surrendering their passport. But that doesn't stop the determined from leaving — in the second quarter of this year, 1,131 Americans bid bon voyage to their citizenship.  

Americans aren't the only ones who say "enough" to their home countries' taxes. Sir Richard Branson, the British billionaire who founded of Virgin Group, revealed this month that he has sold his 200-acre Oxfordshire estate and moved full-time to Necker Island, his retreat in the British Virgin Islands. Now Britain's Sunday Times has accused him of doing it to save taxes.  

Branson responds that "I have not left Britain for tax reasons, but for my love of the beautiful British Virgin Islands and in particular Necker Island . . . . We feel it gives me and my wife Joan the best chance to live another productive few decades. We can also look after our health." He adds that "I have been very fortunate to accumulate so much wealth in my career, more than I need in my lifetime, and would not live somewhere I don't want to for tax reasons."  

Necker sounds like a pleasant-enough exile. The Balinese-inspired "Great House" boasts nine bedrooms, including a 1,500-square-foot master suite. There are six one-bedroom "Bali houses" for guests scattered about the grounds. And there are two swimming pools and two tennis courts. The island is even home to an endangered species, the Virgin Islands dwarf gecko. When Branson isn't in residence kitesurfing or playing tennis, you can rent the whole 74 acres for the bargain rate of just £275,800, or roughly $450,000, per week. Famous guests have included Princess Diana and actress Kate Winslet, who was credited with saving Branson's 90-year-old mother from a fire in 2011.  

But Branson is clearly no dummy. (Forbes magazine ranks him the sixth-richest man in Britain, with an estimated $4.6 billion fortune.) It can't have escaped his notice that the top income tax rate in the islands is 45 percentage points lower than it is in Britain. If you're thinking "wait a minute, the top rate in Britain is 45%, so that means he's paying nothing in the islands," you're right.

What do you think? Does Branson just prefer gentle Caribbean trade winds over dreary English winters? Or is the sunny tax climate the real lure?  

Fortunately, there's an easier way for you to pay less tax — even if you can't afford Necker Island's tropical paradise. Call us for a plan. We'll show you if the new Obamacare and "fiscal cliff" taxes threaten your wallet, and show you how to protect yourself without standing in line for a new passport.

Story Problems for Grownups

Back in grade school, you did all sorts of math problems. You started out with drills to learn your basic addition, subtraction, and multiplication. You learned long division (ugh). You moved on to fractions. And all along the way, as part of your teachers' efforts to convince you that it all matters here in the "real world," you did "story problems." Remember those?

Well, now you're all grown up, so here's a grownup story problem to ponder:

You're an IRS auditor, toiling away to protect the government's revenue base. Then you decide to leave "the dark side" and start your own practice. Things start off great, but you want more. So you mock up some fake tax returns, tell some clients they owe $11 million, and have them make payments into a bogus "trust account." Then you take the money for yourself, make some home improvements, buy a beach house in Mexico, pay to use a private plane, pay $2 million on your personal credit cards and loans, and make some investments. It's good to be rich, isn't it? But now there's a teensy-weensy little problem. The IRS is on to you, your clients are hopping mad, and two of them are scheduled to testify against you! What do you do?

Well, if you're Steven Martinez of Ramona, California, you send your limousine driver (!) to offer a hit man $100,000 to take out the clients. But you don't just whisper some names in his ear and slink back home. Oh, no. Because you're an accountant, you're thorough. Right? So you case the victims and watch them to document their habits. You give the hit man packets with photos of the victims and their homes and detailed instructions and information about them. (How else do you think an accountant would go about whacking his clients?)

Unfortunately, Martinez should have followed his hit man, too. Then Martinez would have seen him scurrying straight to the FBI. (Oops.) It's tough to deny the charges when the Feds have you on video, "cool and calculating," telling your killer to buy two guns — and a silencer! (Try explaining that when it hits YouTube and goes viral!)

Last year, Martinez plead guilty to charges including murder-for-hire, witness tampering involving attempted murder, solicitation of a crime of violence, mail fraud, filing false returns, Social Security fraud, aggravated identity theft, and money laundering. (You've got to wonder, if he had jaywalked to meet with the hit man, would they have charged him with that, too?) On April 12, 2013, District Court Judge William Q. Hayes pretty much threw the book at him, sentencing him to 286 months in prison (plus five years supervised release if he ever makes it out) and ordering him to pay more than $14 million in restitution. Let's see what sort of "home improvements" Martinez can make with the 11 cents/hour he makes stamping license plates!

As tax professionals ourselves, we're appalled at how Steven Martinez betrayed his clients. We're proud to affirm our commitment to helping you save tax within the bounds of the law — because we know just how many legitimate opportunities there are to save. We're pleased to offer you the plan that helps you save taxes and sleep soundly at night. So call us for that plan!

Try Looking in the Couch Cushions

People lose things all the time. Usually it's no big deal. We misplace our phone, keys, or sunglasses — then they show up an hour or a day later, or we replace them. Sometimes it's more serious. We lose money in a stock or a mutual fund — then we make it back over time. But every so often, someone loses big. We just hope it's not our public officials doing the losing!

Last month, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration ("TIGTA"), an IRS watchdog, released a report titled "Affordable Care Act: Tracking of Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund Costs Could Be Improved." That report reveals the the IRS can't account for $67 million set aside to administer the law better known as Obamacare. Now, we're not here to take sides in the ongoing debate over the new law. But we think even those who oppose the law would agree that the agency responsible for administering all the new taxes under that law should be able to track what it spends to do that job!

One of Obamacare's lesser-known provisions established the Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund ("HIRIF") to pay administrative expenses to carry out the law. From 2010 through 2012, the IRS spent $488 million from the fund to implement the Affordable Care Act, hiring 1,272 full-time equivalent employees. TIGTA audited that spending "to determine whether the IRS has an adequate process to accurately account for and report selected ACA implementation costs charged to the HIRIF." And what did they find?

• Some costs were inaccurate or not tracked, and supporting documentation wasn't always kept. "Specifically, the IRS did not account for or attempt to quantify approximately $67 million of indirect ACA costs incurred for FYs 2010 through 2012."
  
• Charges to the HIRIF were sometimes inaccurate and "not always substantiated by reliable supporting documentation."
• Finally, the IRS didn't even bother tracking indirect costs, like rent, communications, and information technology support for employees involved in implementing the new law. "For example, while the IRS may have been able to place most new employees hired for the ACA in existing leased space, it still had to pay rent on this space, could not use the space for other purposes, and could not consider the space for inclusion in its ongoing space reduction efforts."

TIGTA made several specific recommendations. Mind-blowing ideas, too, like cross-checking travel records against employee hours to make sure the travel is related to the purpose of the fund, keeping better records to substantiate direct labor costs, and including indirect expenses in the total cost. The IRS didn't really have much of a defense, so they agreed with all of those recommendations. Unfortunately, the HIRIF money is all gone, so that promise doesn't mean much!

If you're fortunate enough to have $67 million in the first place, you're going to want help keeping it. That's where we come in. We give you the plan you need so you don't lose anything to unnecessary taxes. But time is running out to get that plan before the end of the year — and if you wait too long, you'll be losing money just like the IRS! So call us, now.